Home Committee Royalists Thomians Tickets Current Score Score Board Past Encounters Statistics Souvenir Articles Pictures

ARTICLES | CENTENARY SOUVENIR

THE NINE RUN MATCH - ONE SIDE OF IT BY S.S.PERERA

by S. S. Perera

Venue: Galle Face                            Date: 12th and. 13th March 1885 

There has been much argument ever since this miserable day — for Royalists — that the Royalists did not turn up on the second day of the match etc., etc.

Famous Old Thomian Leonard Arndt wrote a few years ago that the Royalists did not turn up. I have gone through old newspapers of 1885 at the Government Archives recently and find that the stories about the Royalists are not correct. What better proof than newspaper accounts of happenings In far off days— nearly 94 years ago. Accounts of events, even by individuals who took part are mere hazy recollections, and not very accurate.

Comments of some of those who took part in the memorable game— both Royalists and Thomians are given below:—

Mudaliyor Vincent de Silva— Royal Team of 1885— wrote interalia some years ago in the Royal College Souvenir: "after heavy rain overnight, the grounds were quite sodden and unfit for play. On the second day it was worse than ever— the match had to be abandoned due to heavy rain. St. Thomas' by the end of the first day had scored 138 runs for 4 wickets."

C. E. Corea— Royal Team of (885— wrote in the Thomian Souvenir of 1930 :

"On the first day we batted in a deluge of rain— the rain continued— through the succeeding night and the next morning, the ground had become a swamp. We had no alternative but to abandon the Match."

Dr. Gerald' de Saram— Thomian Team of 1885— wrote in a Thomian Souvenir: "St. Thomas' had knocked up a big score about 170 for about 5 or 6 wickets. A very heavy shower of rain came down at this stage and the Royalists refused to go down and field after the rain ceased. The umpires decided that the pitch was fit for play."

The History of the Royal College: "Although the circumstances were quite ordinary Royal were dismissed for 9 runs and St. Thomas' piled up a huge score of 170 for 6 wickets. Then rain inter­fered, but the umpires, one of whom was Mr. Ashley Walker, decided that the ground was fit for play, when play ceased. But though Mr. Walker and the Principal were for continuing the match, the team, urged by a few unsporting boys, refused to play. The disagreement which resulted between the two teams was settled by Royal apologising and the Thomians were sportive enough to bury the hatchet."

St. Thomas' College Magazine— March-April 1885— "When play ceased St. Thomas' had raised the score to 138 runs for 4 wickets. On Friday, play was recommenced at about a quarter to three. The score continued to rise... At this juncture rain interrupted the game and the match was not concluded under the circumstances about which we shall say nothing."

S. P. Joseph— Royal Team 1901—Writing on the 1885 match in the Royal-Thomian Souvenir of 1932 says: "From the pavilion side the ground sloped down to it, and on the church side it sloped away from it, so that it is not difficult to imagine what the pitch looked like after heavy downpour. After the rain ceased the ground was absolutely unplayable. 1 remember this as I took shelter from the rain in the pavilion."

And lastly from "Nestor"— a Royalist who took part in the 1885 match.

Nestor wrote interalia in the Royaf-Thomian Souvenir of 1932: "The weather became unsatis­factory. The Captain spoke to Mr. Walker about it but he was compelled to bow to the inevitable and to prepare his men to make the best of an uphill game. But nobody in his wildest dreams thought it would prove to be so tricky and disastrous a wicket as it was familiar ground on which many a good score had been made under favourable conditions.

Herbert de Saram and Vincent de Silva went down to face the music, but after the first over both fielders and the batsmen beat a hasty retreat to the pavilion. Rain stopped the game for sob time. With resumption of play Wilkins and Orr bowled with deadly effect. The procession wan excruciatingly painful spectacle. The stonewallers as well as sluggers were ruthlessly beaten.

The Captain and Ohimus whose names were proverbial for accurate judgment. Indomitable pluck and consistent scoring returned to the pavilion before they collared the bowling. Never did the writer find it harder to defend his wickets and the fatal ball which over powered him was deemed be the most unlikely one to disturb the "timber yard." It is enough to say that the "Nine Runs" did not take an hour.

Our opponents did not fare well at the outset, but the combination of Thomasz and Wilkins altered the complexion of things. The former lashed out vigorously in his characteristic style, the latter was fortunate in being missed at an early stage. Foenander's score was a useful contribution. The outfield was in a dreadful condition and running was rendered exceedingly difficult. An occasion! slip enlivened the proceedings. Mr. Piuvlus showed favour to the other side when they went in giving them a clear sky and leaving us to "leather hunt through mud and sludge." At the close of the day's play the Thomians had to their credit 138 runs for the loss of 4 wickets.

The team returned home chagrined but not down-hearted. They were made of stew stuff and were determined to go to the field the following day with undaunted courage and put up a plucky fight with better weather. But alas! they were doomed to disappointment.

The eleven were there in good time and the vague surmises that have been entertained may well be regarded as a figment of Imagination. Play was continued on Friday afternoon, but after the Thomians had raised the score to 170 runs for 6 wickets, rain stopped the game.

The Principal who was a martinet and dreaded by all the boys sent for the team on Monday afternoon. He carefully inquired and was satisfied with the explanation offered. In later years, I caused the Captain Intense pain to hear so much unfounded talk circulated about the match."  

The newspaper accounts of the two days' play— from "The Times" and "The Observer" in given below:

From the Ceylon Observer of 14th March 1885:

CRICKET

ST. THOMAS' COLLEGE vs ROYAL COLLEGE

"This annual match was commenced on Galle Face at half past 2 on Thursday last, but after one over rain stopped the game for some time. When play was resumed the Royal College were dismissed in half an hour, after making the grand score of 9 runs. The St. Thomas' boys then went to the wicket and at the close of the day's play had made 138 runs with 4 wickets down. Play was continued at 2.30 p.m. on Friday, but after the St. Thomas' Eleven had raised their score to 170 for the loss of 2 more wickets, rain again stopped the game for about half an hour. As to individual players, Thomasz batted very freely and contributed largely to the score of his side, while Wilkins deserved the highest praise for his really good play scoring 49 without giving a single chance. His bowling was also a remarkable performance."

From the Times of Ceylon of 15th March 1885:

CRICKET

ST. THOMAS' COLLEGE vs Royal College

"The annual match was commenced on Galle Face at half past 2 on Thursday last, but after one over rain stopped the game for some time. When play was resumed the Royal College were dismissed in half an hour, after making the score of 9. St. Thomas' boys then went to the wicket and at the close of the day's play had made 138 runs for 4 wickets down. Play continued at 2.30 p.m. on Friday but after the St. Thomas' Eleven had raised their score to 170 for the loss of two more wickets, rain again stopped the game."

  << BACK